Thom’s Recommended Nikon DSLRs

There’s good news and there’s great news. 

The good news is that there isn’t really a dud amongst all of Nikon’s current DSLRs. The DX DSLRs are all equipped with near-state-of-the-art or state-of-the-art 20 or 24mp crop sensors and differ primarily on how features are brought forward to the user and how many of those features there are. The FX DSLRs come equipped with near-state-of-the-art sensors across the board, but with more variation in pixel count (16 to 45mp).

The great news is that several of Nikon’s DSLRs stand out from the rest:

  • D850 — The D800 was the best all-around DSLR back in 2012, and the 2014 D810 refresh made enough changes that many of us D800 shooters upgraded and were very happy we did. The D850 did that again. The latest D8xx version is faster, has more pixels, a better autofocus system, and is just a little more refined all the way round. The Live View issues are (mostly) solved. The 45mp sensor is about as good as it gets for those that want pixels over high ISO performance, not that it’s a slouch at higher ISO values, all else equal. As I write this, there are only two DSLRs I haven’t used from any maker, and I’ll still stick my neck out and say that the D850 is still the best all-around DSLR here in 2018, just as the D800 was in 2012-2013, and the D810 in 2015-2016. Thom’s Review of the D850.
  • D780 — On paper it doesn’t look like a big change from the five years old D750. In practice, it’s a lot different. Yes, the optional grip and internal flash were dropped, but pretty much everything else was refined and made better. The addition of PD on the sensor means that the D780 acts like a Z6 in Live View, which makes this the best Live View on a DSLR. Nikon did a solid job polishing up their workhorse camera. Thom’s Review of the D780.
  • D7500 — The DX crop sensor has its pluses and minuses. For most of you, the minus is that it’s about a stop removed from the D780 sensor, all else equal, though you can get that back with some clever lens choice (e.g. the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8). The bits of banding deep in the shadows of the D7100 are gone, and the new sensor is very well behaved. The pixel density has dropped a bit from the D7200 but is still near perfect for the wildlife shooter. The constrained buffer of the D7100 is gone, and the D7500 also blows past the D7200 in this respect, plus we now have a 1.3x crop option. Unfortunately, the frame rate and build quality isn’t at the D500 level. That said, the D7500 is the best consumer DSLR Nikon has made, hands down, and it does a very respectable 4K video, too. Thom’s Review of the D7500.
  • D500 — This is a mini-D5 with all the Nikon D5 technology at its core. A new, better autofocusing system, high performance cards and buffer support at 10 fps, an improved metering system, and built-in SnapBridge. Great additional user controls in a carbon fiber/magnesium body. The new 20mp sensor is arguably the best DX-sized sensor currently made (particularly at higher ISO values), the viewfinder and tilting touchscreen LCD top notch and a specification above the other cameras. Thom’s Review of the D500

As I hinted, I can recommend any of the current Nikon DSLRs. But if you’re not going to pick one of the above, you should note a few things about the other options:

  • The D3500 and D5600 shoot Compressed NEF only. What that means is that highlight information is sacrificed to make for more compact files. Nikon calls this visually lossless, and it truly is as long as you’re not making huge post processing changes in the highlights. It’s not a deal breaker, but it’s less than optimal.
  • The D3500 and D5600 have arbitrary feature reductions. With the exception of the swivel touch screen on the D5600, both these cameras remove features you’d find on the D7500, and sometimes controls (front command dial, for example). So run through the specifications list very carefully and make sure what you want is really there. Moreover, these two models changed so little I didn’t bother to create separate reviews for them. See my older reviews. Thom’s Review of the D3400, Thom’s Review of the D5500
  • The D610 doesn’t need to be avoided. The D600 dust/lubricant fiasco totally devalued the D6xx series in most people’s minds. Thus, you’ll find the D610 at ridiculously low prices as demand is low. As with the D3400 and D5600, you have to watch for arbitrary feature reductions (in the D610's case from the D750 and D810), but the D610 is a much more complete camera than those DX consumer DSLRs are to start with; the feature reduction is remarkably minimal. Thom’s Review of the D610
  • The D750 is sort of like the D5600: a middle model. Nikon really wants you to buy the middle model in the DX and FX lineups. Note that both have desirable moveable rear LCD screens (the D750’s tilts up and down), something you usually don’t find on the other models below and above them. There’s nothing at all wrong with the D750. It’s a fine camera, and given it’s price differential, many of you will buy it over a D810. That said, the D810 was enough better than I rarely use my D750, and the D850 is even better. You buy a D750 these days because it’s a bargain for its performance. Thom’s Review of the D750
  • The Df is a bit strange. The DSLR sibling that is the most different is the Df. It’s not just the retro controls, it’s the entire mix of features starting with the 16mp sensor and no video. You really have to want what’s in this package to buy it, I think. For those of you who manual focus through the viewfinder, the Df does have the best focus screen of the Nikon DSLRs, which tells you something about the intended audience. That said, there’s just a little too much Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde to this camera’s personality. Nikon didn’t go all in with the retro-film-like-camera thing, nor did they remove all that much of the digital DSLR from it (it still has Live View, for instance). This makes it a bit of a “tweener” in design, and that shows in some of the control functions. However, this is the smallest of Nikon’s FX DSLRs and the sensor is wickedly good in low light, so coupled with a set of f/1.4 or f/1.8 primes, some folk will be very happy with this camera. The more you zoom, the more I’d suggest this isn’t the camera for you. Thom’s Review of the Df
  • The D5 is really an expensive choice that you need to need. The D500 has virtually everything the D5 has except for one thing: an FX sensor. Moreover, the D5’s sensor is highly tuned towards high ISO work, and the camera nets an additional 2 fps over the D500 in continuous shooting. Still, you pay a big premium for that, so you really have to need those specific things to justify buying a D5. Thom’s Review of the D5. Note: the D6 has appeared as I update this article, but I’ve yet to shoot with the D6, so won’t try to comment on it here.

The popularity of the D810 pushed an awful lot of D800 and D800E cameras onto the used market at decent prices, and the update to the D850 has pushed a few D810's to the used market at good prices, as well. Coupled with some hung-over fear from 2012 about left-side focus weakness, this has made the D800 used market totally collapse, with the D810 used market also being a bit in freefall. You can get an excellent quality, hardly-used D800 or D800E for less than any new FX price, and a used D810 at a very reasonable price. Remember what I wrote above? These were the best all-around DSLRs you could get in 2012 thru 2016. 

But…make sure the seller can prove it’s an official US import. Check the AF Fine Tune and if it’s showing that you need +10 for all of your lenses on a D800/D800E, it was likely fixed by Nikon for the focus problem. Check the shutter count (I’d tend to avoid used D800’s over 70k activations because there are so many available below that). Check the 10-pin connector to make sure that it hasn’t been pushed into the body. Run autofocus tests on the camera: if you can’t get repeatable focus then there’s a chance that the body frame was broken just in front of the rear LCD. Thom’s Review of the D800 and D800E

Negative Bonus
Some will ask where the Nikon V3 fits into DSLR recommendations. Simple: it’s not a DSLR, and the Nikon 1 line is now discontinued. The V3 doesn’t truly handle like a DSLR, it’s not fleshed out and feature-configured like a DSLR, it has lens limitations that come quickly into play, it still includes Nikon’s attempts at something other than photos (the Harry Potteresque Motion Snapshot, for example), and the external EVF is a nuisance you don’t find with DSLRs (or DSLR-like mirrorless cameras). Couple that with a compact camera size battery. 

It’s the 20 fps with fast tracking focus that seems to confuse folk. That’s better than some of the best DSLRs. Fast frame rate and focus plus the fact that a reasonable subset of the DSLR-type features and controls is present—though often with annoying lapses, changes, or limitations—are the reasons why DSLR shooters are intrigued by the V3. The V3 is really a compact camera with interchangeable lenses, basically. Sensor performance doesn’t come close to matching the DSLRs, either; at best case we’re at least three stops down from FX, all else equal. 

Other than snapshot work, the V3 has enough uniqueness and DSLR-ness to appeal to very narrow subsets: the reliable fast focus, folding LCD, and silent shooting make it a pretty easy-to-conceal street shooter, and the 70-300mm CX lens makes the V3 the most portable daylight wildlife shooter you can put together. Beyond that, it gets harder to justify, though as I’ve pointed out on my site, I don’t understand why every golf photographer doesn’t have a V3 in his kit (silent up to 60 fps during swing shots, anyone?). 

Put another way, DSLRs tend to be a jack of all trades, while the V3 is a master of a few. And, of course, now the V3 is discontinued anyway. A far better choice would be to pick up a Z50.

Support this site by purchasing from this advertiser: B&H

text and images © 2020 Thom Hogan
portions Copyright 1999-2019 Thom Hogan-- All Rights Reserved
Follow us on Twitter@bythom, hashtags #bythom, #dslrbodies
other related sites:,